Cases 11 - 20 of 14,185
JONES v. GADSDEN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
ROBERT LEE JONES
Respondent:
GADSDEN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustin, Maxime v. State of Florida
as 2:2024cv14179
Plaintiff:
Maxime Augustin
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simon, Junior v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2024cv60969
Plaintiff:
Junior Diessy Simon
Defendant:
State of Florida, Broward State Attorney's Office and Kathryn Heaven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Hurley v. USA, et al
as 24-11841
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HURLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Olandis Hobbs v. State of Florida, et al
as 24-11833
Petitioner:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, SHERIFF, BAY COUNTY, BAY COUNTY JAIL and others
Ray v. State of Florida (Lee)
as 2:2024cv00525
Petitioner:
Clifton Michael Ray
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jonathan Huff v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11816
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LEE HUFF
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Johnson v. State of Florida (Hendry)
as 2:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Johnson
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Justin Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11812
Petitioner:
JUSTIN JOHNSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Andre Griffin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11768
Petitioner:
ANDRE GRIFFIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
