Cases 11 - 20 of 27
COOK v. CHIEF U.S. MARSHAL et al
as 1:2016cv00890
Plaintiff:
ALEX COOK
Defendant:
CHIEF U.S. MARSHAL, WARDEN and DSOC DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIELICKI v. CHIEF U.S. MARSHAL et al
as 1:2016cv00777
Plaintiff:
JASON BIELICKI
Defendant:
CHIEF U.S. MARSHAL, WARDEN and DSCC DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAYNE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAYNE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO & FIREARMS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00459
Plaintiff:
COREY FERNANDO RUSSELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
as 1:2015cv01612
Petitioner:
WILLIAM H. EVANS, JR.
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. CITY OF DALLAS/TX et al
as 1:2015cv00884
Plaintiff:
DIETRICK L JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
CITY OF DALLAS/TX, DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, DALLAS POLICE IMPOUND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL v. FAUST et al
as 1:2014cv00825
Petitioner:
TIPATECHUTI A. EL
Respondent:
THOMAS FAUST , LANE, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DONELSON v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DONELSON
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURMAN v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv01747
Petitioner:
ALLAH A. BURMAN
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCFADDEN v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2011cv01658
Plaintiff:
TRACY MCFADDEN
Defendant:
SIMON T. WAINWRIGHT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
