Cases 11 - 20 of 904
Hart v. United States Government et al
as 1:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
United States Government, Metropolitan Detention Center, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hart v. CCADC Pod 1 Administration et al
as 1:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
CCADC Pod 1 Administration and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Sandoval v. USA
as 1:2023cv00531
Petitioner:
Joshua Sandoval
Respondent:
USA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Pacheco-Romero v. USA
as 1:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Joe Pacheco-Romero
Respondent:
USA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jimenez v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00495
Petitioner:
Bryan G Jimenez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hart v. MDC
as 1:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
MDC, APD, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
