Cases 11 - 20 of 65
SHEFFIELD v. BROWN et al
as 4:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L SHEFFIELD
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWN, LEWIS, UNKNOWN OFFICIAL NUMBER 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaston v. City of Leesburg et al
as 5:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Angel E. Gaston
Defendant:
City of Leesburg, Joseph Iozzi, Eric W. Lamoreaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Prosecutor et al
as 3:2022cv00826
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Bernard Hunter, III
Defendant:
Prosecutor, Unknown Officers of JSO and Detective Mazone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Unknown Officer, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Officer, Florida Department of Corrections and Samuel St. John
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best v. Pinellas County Jail et al
as 8:2021cv02893
Plaintiff:
Walt Christopher Best
Defendant:
Pinellas County Jail, Unknown Officer 1 and Unknown Officer 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jalieba v. Primary Classification Officer et al
as 0:2021cv62450
Plaintiff:
Paul Jalieba
Defendant:
Primary Classification Officer, Timothy Irven, Investigative Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2021cv01623
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott Smith
Defendant:
Bob Gualtieri, Spiva, Mextzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratcliff v. Spiva et al
as 8:2021cv01043
Defendant:
Captain Spiva, Unknown Officers, Corporal Andrews and others
Petitioner:
David Marc Ratcliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAMBERS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00677
Defendant:
BUTLER, T BENNEFIELD, UNKNOWN OFFICER and others
Plaintiff:
KEON NATHANIEL CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Carlton et al
as 1:2021cv20272
Defendant:
E. Kan, Bureau of Prisons, Warden E.K. Carlton and others
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Robinson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
