Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Nealy v. Vasquez
as 5:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Nealy, Jr
Defendant:
N Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reed v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2013cv02500
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
M D Carvajal, W Vasquez, Spencer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reed v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2013cv02483
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
M D Carvajal, R Martinez, D Cartrette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Carvajal et al
as 5:2013cv02483
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
M D Carvajal, R Martinez, D Cartrette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2013cv01256
Plaintiff:
Leodan Vasquez
Defendant:
M D Carvajal and U S Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCaskill v. Ryder et al
as 1:2009cv02233
Plaintiff:
Washington McCaskill
Defendant:
W Ryder, J Keffer, Crittle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harris v. Justice et al
as 2:2009cv01047
Plaintiff:
Howard Mack Harris
Defendant:
U S Dept of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Joe P Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Price v. Menifee et al
as 1:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamont Price
Defendant:
Fredrick Menifee, Federal Bureau of Prisons, G Maldondo, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv01633
Plaintiff:
John Jeffery Davis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, M Amadinger, W Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Carbajal v. Riley et al
as 6:2008cv01602
Plaintiff:
Sergio Vasquez Carbajal
Defendant:
Harold Riley and Judy Belton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
