Cases 11 - 20 of 764
Rogers v. Lowery et al
as 3:2023cv01936
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Renata Lowery and Wexford Health Sources Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Robert C Rogers
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
Sheriff Jarrod Peters, Officer Ryan Coffee, Officer Jason Juenger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rogers v. Mail Department
as 3:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Robert C Rogers
Defendant:
Mail Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Terre Haute U.S.P., Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Terre Haute U.S.P., . Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Roger et al
as 1:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Larry G Harris
Defendant:
Daniel Roger, Kellie Dennis and . Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stainback, Jr. v. Diveley et al
as 3:2022cv03245
Plaintiff:
Charlie Stainback, Jr
Defendant:
Roger Diveley, John McMahon, Rebecca Witt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Reeves et al
as 3:2022cv03243
Plaintiff:
Solomon Kennedy
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Phil Bryant, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah El v. Frazier et al
as 3:2022cv50387
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
Makala Frazier, Brad Cars, Lance Reinbolz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
