Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Gonzales v. Hatch et al
as 3:2019cv02188
Defendant:
The Plainview Police Department, Cody Neil, Lubbock County and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reschman v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv01069
Plaintiff:
Wallie Sanchez Reschman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Paxton et al
as 5:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
Chris Williams
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Harold King, Curtis Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddley v. Paxton et al
as 5:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Casey Leon Riddley
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Harold King, Curtis Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Rick O Jackson, Chris Williams and Casey Leon Riddley
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Harold King, Curtis Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Paxton et al
as 5:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Rick O Jackson
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Harold King, Curtis Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Wallis et al
as 4:2017cv02527
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kunlay Williams
Defendant:
Robert A. Wallis, Dr. Lloynde, Debbie Echele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mata v. Thomas et al
as 2:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jesus Dominguez Mata
Defendant:
Brian Thomas, Robert Kinkaid, Wally Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00348
Defendant:
Jose Carrillo, Clifford Cherry, Rene Fadoua and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Smart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huff v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 2:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
Chester Lowe Huff
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID, Ernest Gutierrez, Warden, Norris Jackson, Asst. Warden and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
