Cases 11 - 20 of 78
MASON v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER et al
as 3:2020cv07642
Plaintiff:
WALTER I. MASON
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01722
Defendant:
KEEFEE COMPANY and WARDEN DAVID KELSEY
Plaintiff:
WALTER WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01607
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY FREEHOLDERS, ARAMARK and WARDEN DAVID KELSEY
Plaintiff:
WALTER WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. FOLEY et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
SC/O POWELL, SC/O MANDERA, SC/O ACEBO and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER WOODS, THADDEUS THOMAS and MATTHEW SHIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOWNSEND v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2019cv15157
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Petitioner:
WALTER TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HESTER v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2019cv04521
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL GURBIR, WHARTON POLICE DEPT., ROBERT ASARO-ANGELO and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN D. HESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORMASI v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv16340
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Petitioner:
WALTER A. TORMASI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COFER v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2018cv09590
Plaintiff:
BRIAN COFER
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, WILLIE BONDS, SERGEANT JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORMASI v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv01203
Plaintiff:
WALTER A. TORMASI
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, MARCUS O. HICKS, MELINDA HALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASTERS v. KINTOCK GROUP et al
as 2:2017cv05430
Plaintiff:
KYLE MASTERS
Defendant:
KINTOCK GROUP, DAVID FAWKNER, DIANE DEBARRI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
