Cases 11 - 20 of 767
JACKSON v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2023cv23183
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, VICTORIA KUHN, ALISHA LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLAZO v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv22777
Plaintiff:
ISHAWN A. COLLAZO
Defendant:
D. SMITH, MR. PATTERSON and SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIELL v. FISHER et al
as 1:2023cv21983
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN D. HARRIELL
Defendant:
KEISHA FISHER, OFFICER HARRISON and OFFICER GROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINS v. ISMAN et al
as 1:2023cv22009
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. WIGGINS
Defendant:
HONORABLE JAMES E. ISMAN, JOHN ZARYCH, ESQ., ELLEN LOUGHNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINS v. NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2023cv20921
Petitioner:
ERIC D. WIGGINS
Respondent:
NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCCOY v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2023cv21272
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MCCOY
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, TPR. J. D. ANGELO, TPR. M. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D. P. v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 2:2023cv20573
Plaintiff:
D. P.
Defendant:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN, ADULT DIAGNOSTICS AND TREATMENT CENTER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2023cv20593
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. SMITH
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINS v. THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2023cv18504
Petitioner:
ERIC D. WIGGINS
Respondent:
THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HURLEY v. RAHILL et al
as 3:2023cv04327
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HURLEY
Defendant:
JUDGE KIMARIE RAHILL, PROSECUTOR ALYSSA MANDERA, VITA S. MENNIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
