Cases 11 - 20 of 18,932
JONES v. DODSON et al
as 1:2024cv06105
Plaintiff:
MALIK S. JONES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. DODSON, JAMES HERBERT, JAMES BARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. KELLY et al
as 1:2024cv06107
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL KELLY, LT. KINSLEY and ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES GAITAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2024cv06108
Plaintiff:
MANUEL TORRES GAITAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, NUN WARDEN, NURSE LOPAZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BADU v. CHARLES
as 2:2024cv03931
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
WARDEN RON CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ-LEYVA v. Warden, FCI Fort Dix
as 1:2024cv06118
Petitioner:
GERARDO ANTONIO SANCHEZ-LEYVA
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOLLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06156
Petitioner:
CARL LEE HOLLOWAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROBLES v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv06161
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY ROBLES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, WARDEN and FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06010
Plaintiff:
KEITH E. MEARS
Defendant:
C/O SMITH and WARDEN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARS v. CASALE et al
as 2:2024cv06008
Plaintiff:
KEITH MEARS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE N. CASALE, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOKES v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv06037
Petitioner:
BRAD STOKES
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
