Cases 11 - 20 of 102,692
Bonner v. West et al
as 5:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Bonner
Defendant:
John West, Asst Dir. Greg Martin, Dir. Robert Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantu v. USA
as 3:2024cv01217
Petitioner:
Christopher Joe Cantu
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lange
as 6:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Quinten Lovell Brown
Defendant:
Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Norman Byrd
Defendant:
NFN Gonzales, NFN Cummings and NFN Suffield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olvera-Rodriguez v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jose Francisco Olvera-Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thompson v. The United States Of America
as 4:2024cv01892
Petitioner:
Charles Wendell Thompson
Respondent:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01897
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01902
Petitioner:
Leonardo Gutierrez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thompson v. Laurie Sue Baldwin et al
as 4:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant:
Laurie Sue Baldwin, Marlon Thomas, Nueces Country Jail Correctional Officer Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
