Cases 11 - 20 of 12,921
Mitchell et al v. Phillips et al
as 5:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell, Whitney Thatcher, Vanessa Vasquez and others
Defendant:
Officer Jason Phillips and Sgt. Sullenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Small et al
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Robin Anderson and Lance Mercer
Defendant:
Steve Small, Lindsey and Rebecca Midkiff Huff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. USA
as 6:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Justin Blake Adams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rice v. Dardanelle
as 6:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
Antonio Rice
Respondent:
Arkansas Police Department Dardanelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Small v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Kevin Small and Arthur Greentree
Not Yet Classified:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole Detainer/Warrant #4383V
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edmonson v. USA
as 6:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Douglas M. Edmonson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Morris v. USA
as 3:2024cv00338
Petitioner:
Leroy Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Coursey v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Coursey
Defendant:
Steven Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roth v. Metcalfe County Sheriff Office
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Nathan Donald Roth
Defendant:
Metcalfe County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USA
as 5:2024cv00147
Petitioner:
Lamonte H. Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
