Cases 191 - 200 of 841
Johnson v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv00310
Plaintiff:
Stanley Jules Johnson
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perkins v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00041
Respondent:
N Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Steve Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Frank Griffin
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaVergne v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00034
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Trish Foster, Larry Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon S. LaVergne
Name/Rank Unknown) (LSP:
Supervisor of Investigative Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Allen Bell
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Cain
as 2:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
Thomas Williams
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gant v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Gary Gant
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nyberg v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Michael Dane Nyberg, Jr.
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stewart v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Keith Stewart
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Landry v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00005
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Kentrell Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
