Cases 201 - 210 of 6,727
Martin v. Bellendir et al
as 5:2023cv03164
Plaintiff:
Clayton Jay Martin
Defendant:
Brian Bellendir and Doug Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar (ID 129288) v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv03135
Plaintiff:
Raymundo I. Aguilar
Defendant:
Mark Smith, Shannon Wilson, Moriah Plowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amman Reu-El (ID 55931) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03139
Plaintiff:
King Phillip Amman Reu-El and Phillip Delbert Cheatham, Jr.
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laughrey v. Commandant
as 5:2023cv03180
Petitioner:
James A. Laughrey
Respondent:
Christine Wormuth, Christopher Glover and Commandant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kelly (ID 61483) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2023cv03142
Plaintiff:
Terrance J. Kelly
Defendant:
Dan Schnurr, Fred C. Early, John C. Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hudson
as 5:2023cv03168
Plaintiff:
Monare Moore
Defendant:
Donald Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chaney v. USA
as 2:2023cv02331
Petitioner:
Davonte Laron Chaney
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walker v. Douglas County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners
as 5:2023cv03150
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lee Walker
Defendant:
Douglas County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker (ID 128454) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03148
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lee Walker
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collier (ID 47548) v. James et al
as 5:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Collier
Defendant:
Cheryl James, John/Jane Doe, Nola Foulston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
