Cases 211 - 220 of 3,641
Sivak v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Centurion of Idaho LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Hayes
Defendant:
Centurion of Idaho LLC, Kayla Miller, 6 Jane and John Doe Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clyne v. Carlin
as 3:2023cv00243
Petitioner:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Respondent:
T Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodges-Foote v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kylie Hodges-Foote
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Erik Jon Payne
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge David C. Nye, Judge B. Lynn Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farley v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Casey Farley
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lincoln v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Joshuah Lincoln
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevarez v. Idaho State Security Institution
as 1:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Conrad Cesar Nevarez
Defendant:
Idaho State Security Institution and Idaho State Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willard v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Cody Willard
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
