Cases 21 - 30 of 17,837
White v. McNevin
as 4:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Jermeal White
Defendant:
P. McNevin, Lieutenant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Streck
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jason Wolfe
Defendant:
Rob Streck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benedict v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00948
Petitioner:
Joshua Benedict
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Easley v. Didion et al.
as 3:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Easley
Defendant:
Correction Officer Megan Marie Didion, Correction Officer Spiegner and Ms. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alward v. Newell et al
as 4:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Brian Newell, Warden Healey, Elkton FSL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampkins v. Center of Science and Industry (COSI)
as 2:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. Lampkins
Defendant:
Center of Science and Industry (COSI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. PHIPPS et al
as 2:2024cv02835
Plaintiff:
RODNEY A. PERRY
Defendant:
Karen Phipps, MIKE E. MORGAN, BLAIR NANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERRY v. PHIPPS et al
as 2:2024cv02837
Plaintiff:
RODNEY A. PERRY
Defendant:
Karen Phipps, MIKE E. MORGAN, ROXANNE T. ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRISON v. HAWKINS et al
as 2:2024cv02832
Petitioner:
Carlos Q Garrison
Respondent:
DANIEL HAWKINS, MICHAEL RUCKER, MATTHEW J. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
