Cases 21 - 30 of 109
Black v. Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Miciah Black
Defendant:
Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Correctional Officer Christopher Hartley and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onunwor v. Black
as 1:2023cv00810
Petitioner:
Clifton C. Onunwor
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Black
as 1:2023cv00581
Petitioner:
Allen Murphy
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Squires v. Black
as 1:2022cv02271
Petitioner:
Jeff Squires and Jeffrey A. Squires
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Black
as 5:2022cv02264
Petitioner:
Victor Gutierrez
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gulley v. Black
as 5:2022cv02217
Petitioner:
Jesse Gulley
Respondent:
Warden Jennifer Gillece Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Virostek v. Black
as 1:2022cv02166
Petitioner:
Michael J Virostek and Michael J. Virostek
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Black
as 1:2022cv02155
Petitioner:
Shawn-Lamar Jones
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Black
as 1:2022cv02116
Petitioner:
Walter Harris
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lazzerini v. Black
as 1:2022cv01481
Petitioner:
Frank D. Lazzerini
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
