Cases 21 - 30 of 168
Mason v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Receiver:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04529
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mason v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02102
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. James Allred Unit Officials et al
as 4:2023cv03510
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
James Allred Unit Officials, Preston Smith Unit Officials, Bill Clements Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Detaining Officers of Incident et al
as 5:2023cv01250
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
Detaining Officers of Incident, Owner/Leaser of 139 Bonanza 78237, The Person that made the 911 call and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Mason
as 5:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
John Gabriel Rios
Respondent:
Wanda Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. State of Texas
as 3:2023cv01636
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. TDCJ Agencies
as 2:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
TDCJ Agencies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Jimmy Smith, Bryan Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
