Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 30 of 43
CLARKE v. USA
as 1:2017cv00176
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ZION CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DURAN v. OBAMA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02358
Plaintiff: GULED HASSAN DURAN
Defendant: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II , ASHTON B. CARTER and PETER J. CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRANCH-EL v. CLARK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01379
Plaintiff: WILLIE BRANCH-EL
Defendant: KARLA DEE CLARK, SUSAN R. WINFIELD and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMADI DAVLIATOV v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv01959
Respondent: BARACK OBAMA , ASHTON CARTER and PETER J. CLARKE
Petitioner: MUHAMMADI DAVLIATOV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2015cv00493
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: FLOYD CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BRANCH v. CLARK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02005
Plaintiff: TOMMY T. BRANCH
Defendant: NICHOLUS Y. CLARK and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01193
Plaintiff: RONALD L. DAVIS
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JOHN CLARK and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv00254
Plaintiff: MELVIN CLARK, JR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02089
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANSEN v. LAPPIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01254
Plaintiff: SCOTT KELLY HANSEN
Defendant: HARLEY G. LAPPIN, JOHN CLARK and PAUL M. O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?