Cases 21 - 30 of 262
Mays v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
Otis R Mays
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, F C I Oakdale, Warden Marteneiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mekdara v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Sangvang Mekdara
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. Dauzat
as 5:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
Richard F Collins, Jr
Defendant:
Michelle Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios-Sandoval v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2023cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rios-Sandoval
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. Stalsby et al
as 2:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Otis R Mays
Defendant:
SIS Officer Stalsby, James Kirkland, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Frey v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
Peter John Frey
Defendant:
F Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez-Hernandez v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Lopez-Hernandez
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ortez v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Denis Ivan Ortez
Defendant:
Warden and Warden F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pineda v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
Raul Pineda
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Quinonez v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Quinonez
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
