Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Weaver v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2017cv14223
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Sonny DiRand Weaver, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NEWBOLD v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LABARRON NEWBOLD, ROBERT L ERNEST, JR, J EVANS and others
Defendant:
R SCOTT, P J BONDI, LATEASHA LYNN POWEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Masters
as 9:2017cv80126
Petitioner:
Jason Price Weaver
Respondent:
Bart Masters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Weaver v. Israel et al
as 0:2016cv61755
Plaintiff:
Randy Anthony Weaver
Defendant:
Scott J. Israel, Charles A. Jenkins, Christopher Busbey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Jenkins et al
as 0:2016cv61726
Plaintiff:
Randy Anthony Weaver
Defendant:
Charles A. Jenkins and Scott Israel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Overton v. Virginia Selam Veterans Medical Center et al
as 8:2015cv01832
Plaintiff:
Herbert Overton, Jr.
Defendant:
Virginia Selam Veterans Medical Center, Federal Medical Center Butner North Carolina, Lieutenant Barbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEAVER v. BIGGERSTAFF
as 5:2014cv00197
Plaintiff:
DANIEL T WEAVER
Defendant:
BIGGERSTAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEMISON v. MORGAN et al
as 3:2012cv00597
Plaintiff:
CURTISS L JEMISON
Defendant:
DAVID MORGAN, HEMPHILL, COTTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEMISON v. MORGAN et al
as 3:2012cv00517
Plaintiff:
CURTISS L JEMISON
Defendant:
DAVID MORGAN, HEMPHILL, COTTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Tucker et al.
as 3:2012cv00886
Plaintiff:
Urshima Weaver
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
