Cases 21 - 30 of 79
Armstrong v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2018cv02846
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Duane E. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARMSTRONG v. USA
as 5:2018cv00128
Petitioner:
CHARLES A ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Armstrong v. Manatee County Sheriff's Department et al
as 8:2017cv02929
Plaintiff:
Cederic L. Armstrong
Defendant:
Manatee County Sheriff's Department, Deputy Sheehan and Deputy Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Ivey et al
as 6:2017cv02008
Plaintiff:
Dewey U. Armstrong
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, Global Tel Link and Armor Correctional Health Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dial v. Lockett et al
as 5:2017cv00366
Plaintiff:
Shaundelle Dontio Dial
Defendant:
Charles L. Lockett, G. Miller, FNU Kluckner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willich v. Upshaw et al
as 3:2017cv00822
Plaintiff:
Allen Willich
Defendant:
Upshaw, Cure, Masso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. SECRETARY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2017cv00039
Plaintiff:
MORGAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, R HODGE and DEAN PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. State of Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv14276
Plaintiff:
Gerald Armstrong
Defendant:
State of Florida Department of Corrections and State of Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong v. United States of America
as 6:2016cv01069
Petitioner:
Brandon Scott Armstrong
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Armstrong v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2016cv00277
Petitioner:
Telly Armstrong
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
