Cases 21 - 30 of 1,288
Reed v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Vadol Reed and Vadol M. Reed
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and C. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Weems et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
Ronnie Weems, J. Manning, Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Zabala
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marlon Brown
Defendant:
Romeyn Zabala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Terry
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Shannon D. Withers, Troy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BANKS v. LONG et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
JESSE BANKS and JESSE BANKS, III
Defendant:
T LONG, MS. MELVIN, MICHAEL BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morra v. Crawford et al
as 6:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William J. Morra, Jr.
Defendant:
Darren S Crawford, Robert Brown, Monique Haughton Worrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpo-Brown v. FNU et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Defendant:
Gunther FNU, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. BASFORD et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
SHONDARIOUS CLEO BROWN
Defendant:
L BASFORD and R BORDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
