Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Haaby v. Mosman et al
as 3:2017cv00629
Defendant:
D Charles Bailey, NFN Bailey, Bob Hermann and others
Plaintiff:
Darrick Shane Haaby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bailey v. Frantz et al
as 3:2016cv01917
Petitioner:
Edward Earl Bailey
Respondent:
Board of Parole, Judge Frantz, Sandra Rorick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. City of Redmond Oregon et al
as 6:2016cv01055
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
City of Redmond Oregon and Redmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padgett v. Byerly et al
as 6:2016cv00798
Defendant:
Captain Alvis, Sgt. Arnoux, T. Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Adkisson et al
as 1:2016cv00485
Defendant:
Maric W. Adkisson, Benjamin Becker, Allen Bergstorm and others
Plaintiff:
Korderro Robert Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Myrick
as 2:2015cv01423
Petitioner:
Dominic Bailey
Respondent:
John Myrick
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emery v. Premo et al
as 6:2015cv01227
Defendant:
Nurse Ann, T. Bailey, T. Byerly and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Nooth
as 2:2014cv00166
Petitioner:
Robert Bailey
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey et al v. State of Oregon et. al. et al
as 3:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Edward Bailey and Ronnie Scott Medinger
Defendant:
J. Hanson, Greg Hunter, Rob Persson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Frost
as 3:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Edward Earl Bailey
Defendant:
Sarah Frost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
