Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Samii v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2016cv02665
Defendant: Raymond Chan, City of Los Angeles and Kevin James
Plaintiff: Alireza Samii
Brooks v. Jorgensen et al
as 5:2016cv01846
Plaintiff: Charles Anthony Brooks
Defendant: H. Jorgensen, G. Teixiera, J. Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lai v. USA
as 3:2016cv01431
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Dennis Chan Lai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shepherd v. California Forensic Medical Group et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01894
Plaintiff: Cameron Shepherd
Defendant: California Forensic Medical Group, Lilian Chan, Tami Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chan v. USA(2255-(96-cr-350-WBS))
as 2:2015cv01367
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Mady Chan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mariom Amador Gonzalez v. Warden Soto et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv03502
Defendant: CO Archuleta, Sgt Chan, Sgt Devine and others
Plaintiff: Mario Amador Gonzalez
Park v. Arnold We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv03001
Petitioner: Chan Seh Park
Respondent: Eric Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lai v. Copenhaver We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01775
Petitioner: Dennis Chan Lai
Respondent: Paul Copenhaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lai v. Copenhaver We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01705
Petitioner: Dennis Chan Lai
Respondent: Paul Copenhaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniels v. Monroe/Lienberger Detention Centers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02176
Plaintiff: Landry Daniels
Defendant: Monroe/Lienberger Detention Centers, City of Woodland, Miguel Castaneda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?