Cases 21 - 30 of 261
Harmon v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
Michael Vincent Harmon
Defendant:
Sarah Jessie Ferguson, Sargent Brent Bond, Officer Christopher L. Vezina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fenwick v. Hempfling
as 4:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Andrew Fenwick
Defendant:
Christopher Hempfling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locke v. Bobby et al
as 3:2022cv00572
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Locke, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Bobby and Officer Cooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Gilley
as 6:2022cv00192
Petitioner:
Christopher James Davila
Respondent:
Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Condron v. Paul
as 5:2022cv00261
Petitioner:
Christopher N. Condron
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Major v. Lexington Fayette Urban Detention Center et al
as 5:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Major
Defendant:
Lexington Fayette Urban Detention Center and Eric King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davila v. Gilley
as 6:2022cv00176
Petitioner:
Christopher James Davila
Respondent:
Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Kent Hendrickson, Glenn E. Acree, Christopher Nickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Lewis et al
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Lance Christopher White
Defendant:
Mike Lewis, Sergeant Brandon Lampton, Janet Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Daley et al
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
James Kline Myers
Defendant:
Jailer James Daley, Deven Rodriquez, Deputy Karl T. Markowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
