Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Barnes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00648
Petitioner:
William Clyde Barnes
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGee v. Mason, et al
as 3:2011cv01236
Plaintiff:
BERNARD CLYDE MCGEE
Defendant:
SAMUEL E MASON and LARRY D CANNADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv00502
Plaintiff:
Clyde Dale Evans, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prison, Dr. Cintron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCGEE v. MASON, et al
as 5:2011cv00231
Plaintiff:
BERNARD CLYDE MCGEE
Defendant:
SAMUEL E MASON and LARRY D CANNADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGEE v. TIFFT, et al
as 5:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
BERNARD CLYDE MCGEE
Defendant:
R P TIFFT, SLOAN, BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2010cv00692
Petitioner:
Clyde McGhee
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baltasaras v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2010cv00628
Plaintiff:
Romilus Baltasaras
Defendant:
Scott Middlebrooks, Mary LNU, Earl LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milledge v. McDonough et al
as 3:2007cv00976
Defendant:
Wilton Joseph Fontenot, Clyde Sanford Daniel, Joni White and others
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Milledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baltasaras v. Middle Brooks et al
as 1:2010cv23770
Plaintiff:
Romilus Baltasaras
Defendant:
Scott Middle Brooks, Ms. Mary, Mr. Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00199
Petitioner:
Clyde T. Jennings
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
