Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Perdow v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Perdow
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Richard Catts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv01312
Plaintiff:
Curtis G. Elliott
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, James Welch, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Correct Care Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01311
Plaintiff:
Darrell Trotter
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC, D. Squires and Sam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkell v. Morgan et al
as 1:2012cv01304
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Parkell
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan, Mental Health Management, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edelin v. Correctional Care Solutions et al
as 1:2012cv00851
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Edelin
Defendant:
Correctional Care Solutions, DeRosa, Christine Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2012cv00841
Plaintiff:
James F. Taylor
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Mazur, Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stones v. McDonald et al
as 1:2012cv00711
Plaintiff:
Dereck E. Stones
Defendant:
Lawrence McDonald, Correctional Medical Services Inc., Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Averill v. Celello et al
as 1:2012cv00599
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Averill
Defendant:
Thomas F. Celello, Christina Jones, Robert Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeVary v. Derosiers et al
as 1:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Stephen DeVary
Defendant:
Derosiers, Correct Care Solutions and John Doe 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bredbenner v. Malloy et al
as 1:2011cv00739
Plaintiff:
Donald Bredbenner
Defendant:
Robert Malloy, Doane, Ihoma Chuks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
