Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Cote (ID 62263) v. Dozier et al
as 5:2014cv03058
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Cote
Defendant:
Sue Ann Dozier, (fnu) Saffo, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor (ID 40023) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2013cv03210
Plaintiff:
Vincent Taylor
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Douglas Waddington, Randy Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 5:2013cv03127
Plaintiff:
Gary Lynn Faulkner
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Carrie Kay, Johnson County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foshee v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2012cv03230
Plaintiff:
John Harold Foshee
Defendant:
James Heimgartner, Correct Care Solutions, State Board of Kansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner (ID 96234) vs. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 5:2012cv03212
Plaintiff:
TyRon Wagner
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Karl Saffo, Ellen Bartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parrish (ID 25121) v. Correct Care Solutions
as 5:2012cv03208
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denmark-Wagner (ID 93947) v. Correct Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv03169
Plaintiff:
Charles Denmark-Wagner
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Inc., Ray Roberts, (fnu) Lawhorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trammell (ID 55831) v. Denning et al
as 5:2012cv03152
Plaintiff:
David Trammell
Defendant:
Frank Denning , FNU LNU (1), FNU LNU (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Correct Care Solutions
as 5:2012cv03139
Plaintiff:
Jose Garza
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams (ID 48871) v. Impact Design, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv03056
Plaintiff:
Frank L. Williams
Defendant:
Impact Design, Inc., David McKune, Ray Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
