Cases 21 - 30 of 33
YEARBY v. JOHNSON
as 5:2017cv00231
Plaintiff:
TORIC LAVERN YEARBY
Defendant:
P D JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Toni Bowden, Ebony Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORDUNEZ v. SEHWEINSBERY, et al
as 5:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
JAVIER E ORDUNEZ
Defendant:
SEHWEINSBERY, THOMPSON, D JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ordunez v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv21531
Plaintiff:
Javier E. Ordunez
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Sehweinsbery, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHEELER v. CREWS
as 5:2014cv00271
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE WHEELER
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS, WILLIAM CHURCHWELL, R SILCOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEFFIELD v. TUCKER et al
as 3:2014cv00046
Plaintiff:
LANCE SHEFFIELD
Defendant:
KEN TUCKER, DAVENPORT, HEATHERINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASH v. OAKES et al
as 3:2013cv00477
Plaintiff:
SCOTTIE B ASH
Defendant:
B OAKES, W D JOHNSON, WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2012cv00598
Petitioner:
Clifton D. Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2012cv23579
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Johnson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2010cv01137
Petitioner:
Ronald D. Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
