Cases 21 - 30 of 49
HAWTHORNE v. GRAY et al
as 1:2011cv01406
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. HAWTHORNE
Defendant:
VINCENT GRAY, DC JAIL and WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GAYMON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2010cv01879
Plaintiff:
EDDIE GAYMON, Jr.
Defendant:
DEVON BROWN, WAINWRIGHT, DARRYL ELLISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAK v. DC JAIL
as 1:2010cv01752
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEAK
Defendant:
DC JAIL and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANCH-EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv00328
Petitioner:
WILLIE BRANCH-EL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DISTRICT COURT OF DC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMAS v. DC JAIL et al
as 1:2009cv01619
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH THOMAS
Defendant:
DC JAIL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2009cv01072
Plaintiff:
LOWELL B. LONG
Defendant:
DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and BISHOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLANCHARD v. THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2009cv00981
Plaintiff:
RAY BLANCHARD, III
Defendant:
THE DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CEASAR v.OBEBE, et al.
as 1:2009cv00609
Plaintiff:
MAURICE CEASAR
Defendant:
DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE, R. A. KRANZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. DC CITY ADMINISTRATOR et al
as 1:2009cv00430
Plaintiff:
THOMAS EDWARD HARRIS
Defendant:
DC CITY ADMINISTRATOR, DIRECTOR OF DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SIMON WAINWRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HILL v. GOVERNMENT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2008cv02241
Plaintiff:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DC CORPORATION COUNSEL and JOHN A. WILSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
