Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. CUSIP SERVICE BUREAU
as 1:2009cv00852
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE DEAN THOMAS
Defendant:
CUSIP SERVICE BUREAU
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
THOMAS v. COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY ADMINISTRATOR OF NATIONAL BANKS
as 1:2009cv00794
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE DEAN THOMAS
Defendant:
COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY ADMINISTRATOR OF NATIONAL BANKS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SHEPHARD v. POPE et al
as 1:2008cv02125
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
SHIRLEY POPE, JOHN WILLAMOWSKI, TODD BOOKS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LAWRENCE et al v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv01344
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES LAWRENCE and WILLIAM DEAN WETMORE
Defendant:
WILLIAM SUTER and GAIL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GAY v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv01149
Plaintiff:
WILMER B. GAY
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, NICOLE S. MORRIS, RICHARD FEDER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HESS v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2008cv01036
Petitioner:
JEFFREY DEAN HESS
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DEAN v. GONZALEZ et al
as 1:2008cv00857
Petitioner:
AUSTON TYE DEAN
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALEZ and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
IJEMBA v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv01541
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER IFFANYI IJEMBA
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IJEMBA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv01079
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER IFFANYI IJEMBA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
