Cases 21 - 30 of 255
Jenkins v. Moody
as 9:2023mc80034
Petitioner:
Derrick Tyrone Jenkins
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stabile v. Yes Care et al
as 6:2022cv02249
Plaintiff:
Derrick Joseph Stabile
Defendant:
Yes Care, T. Robinson and Mental Health Provider for Yes Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Pleiman et al
as 3:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
Justin R.W. Mitchell
Defendant:
Eric Matthe Pleiman, Derrick W. Holmes and Putman County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Thompkins et al
as 3:2022cv01112
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Frederick
Defendant:
D. Thompkins, R. Johnson and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRIN v. BEAVERS et al
as 3:2022cv20350
Plaintiff:
WENDELL CURRIN
Defendant:
TIMOTHY BEAVERS, WALTER GOYER and DERRICK PURVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. DIXON et al
as 3:2022cv20421
Plaintiff:
DERRICK G JAMES
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON and DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shuford v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Derrick Shuford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
EDWARDS v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M EDWARDS
Defendant:
BOYLE, EADDU, F MOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Frederick
Defendant:
R. Johnson, Department of Correction and D. Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHARLESTON v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00209
Petitioner:
DERRICK CHARLESTON
Respondent:
GADSDEN COUNTY FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
