Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Craig v. State of Nevada ex rel The Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv02388
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, A. Buencamino, Doe Director NDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Warden et al
as 3:2016cv00538
Petitioner:
Jesse Anderson
Respondent:
Tony Corda, Adam Endle, Ed Gray and others
Defendant:
Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Baker et al
as 2:2016cv01546
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Harold M. Byrne, Barbara K. Cegavske and others
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lunford v. C.O. John Doe
as 3:2016cv00391
Defendant:
C.O. John Doe
Plaintiff:
Darren A. Lunford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lash v. Joanne "Doe" et al
as 3:2016cv00202
Defendant:
Ada "Doe", Joanne "Doe", Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
John Lash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brodsky v. Williams et al
as 3:2015cv00506
Defendant:
Katie (Doe), Thorpe and Williams
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Brodsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Howard v. Polley et al
as 2:2015cv01698
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, John Doe, Sheriff Lombardo and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Polley et al
as 2:2015cv01458
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, John Doe, Sheriff Joe Lombardo and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Keast et al
as 3:2015cv00383
Defendant:
Denise Doe, Terri Jacobs, John Keast and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davitt v. Doe
as 2:2014cv01504
Plaintiff:
Michael Davitt
Defendant:
John Doe 32543
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
