Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Johnson v. Flores et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01088
Petitioner: Joseph Johnson, Jr
Respondent: Edward Flores and Jerry E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singh v. Sepulveda et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv01022
Petitioner: Satinderpal Singh and Satinderpal Singh
Respondent: David Sepulveda, Edward Flores, Anthony M. Aiello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Singh v. Sepulveda et al
as 3:2008cv00881
Petitioner: Gurdeep Singh
Respondent: David Sepulveda, Edward Flores, Anthony M. Aiello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singh v. Selpulveda et al
as 4:2007cv04043
Petitioner: Baljit Singh
Respondent: David Selpulveda, Edward Flores, Anthony M. Aiello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Guido v. Sepulveda et al
as 3:2007cv03873
Plaintiff: Jose Guido
Defendant: David Sepulveda, Edward Flores, Anthony M. Aiello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gaspar v. Sepulveda et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv02905
Petitioner: Jesus Gaspar and Jesus Gaspar
Respondent: David Sepulveda, Edward Flores, Anthony M. Aiello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Romayov v. Santa Clara County Main Jail et al
as 5:2007cv01444
Petitioner: John A. Romayov
Respondent: Santa Clara County Main Jail and Edward Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Litmon v. Babcock We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2003cv03996
Petitioner: David Litmon, Jr.
Respondent: Edward Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?