Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Freeman v. Bradshaw
as 4:2011cv00791
Petitioner:
William A. Freeman
Respondent:
Margaret Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quinn v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2011cv00268
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Quinn, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Freeman, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mubashshir et al v. Moore et al
as 3:2010cv02802
Plaintiff:
Mujtabaa L. Mubashshir, Gibreal Jallow, Michael Robert and others
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Edward Sheldon, Jaquelyn Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mubashshir et al v. Moore et al
as 3:2010cv02591
Plaintiff:
Mujtabaa L. Mubashshir, Gibreal Jallow, Michael Robert and others
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Warren Burbury, Jaquelyn Burn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mubashshir et al
as 3:2010cv02501
Plaintiff:
Mujtabaa L. Mubashshir, Gibreal Jallow, Michael Robert and others
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Warren Burbury, Jaquelyn Burn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Kelley
as 1:2010cv01413
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Bennie Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00111
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Freeman v. Gansheimer
as 4:2010cv00369
Petitioner:
Gentry William Freeman
Respondent:
Rich Gansheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2010cv00035
Petitioner:
Richard Bryan Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardaway v. Costello et al
as 3:2009cv02989
Plaintiff:
Mario Hardaway
Defendant:
Donn Costello and Jeffery A. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
