Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Dice v. Fuller et al
as 3:2018cv00347
Plaintiff:
David L. Dice, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Fuller, Ronnie Fussell, Lenny Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv20072
Plaintiff:
Michael Walter Owens
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv20071
Plaintiff:
Michael Walter Owens
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Sanchez et al
as 0:2017cv60882
Plaintiff:
Donnie Burnell Monroe
Defendant:
Frank Sanchez, Christopher Durant, Carlos Guerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv00498
Petitioner:
Jason Fuller
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuller v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv00134
Petitioner:
Lewis Edward Fuller
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuller v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2015cv01468
Petitioner:
Lewis Edward Fuller, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grammer v. Shirk et al
as 3:2015cv00440
Plaintiff:
William Grammer
Defendant:
Matt Shirk and Brook Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FULLER v. DANIELS
as 4:2014cv00033
Plaintiff:
DORIAN RIENARD FULLER
Defendant:
M DANIELS, D PARISH and HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv14469
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Fuller
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
