Cases 21 - 30 of 453
Roberts v. Moats et al
as 1:2022cv01227
Plaintiff:
Demetrick Roy Roberts
Defendant:
Dr Scott Moats, Jeffrey Frank, Michael Segal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. Hasemyer et al
as 3:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
Jeramey R Brown
Defendant:
Chad Hasemyer, Jessica Huffman, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Jeffrey et al
as 3:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Adrian Thomas
Defendant:
Rob Jeffrey, Anthony Wills, Frank Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swan v. Unwin et al
as 3:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
William Swan
Defendant:
Donald Richard Unwin, Angie Crain, Frank Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv02490
Plaintiff:
Frank Hicks
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Greene and J.T.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mansell v. Segal et al
as 1:2022cv01121
Petitioner:
Danae Mansell
Respondent:
Michael Segal, Jeff Frank, Dr Lee Ho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Youngman et al
as 3:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Spencer Martin
Defendant:
C/O Youngman, C/O Montroy, C/O Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Caruana et al
as 3:2022cv50065
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jackson
Defendant:
Gary Caruana, Robert Redmond, Krapf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Franke et al
as 3:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jamal A. Harris
Defendant:
John E. Franke, Kimberly Dunn and David Ebrahim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Widdows v. Jackson County et al
as 3:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Alice Widdows
Defendant:
Jackson County, Jackson County Sheriff, Lee Kersten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
