Cases 21 - 30 of 293
McCray v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
Gabriel L. McCray
Defendant:
Morgan Martin and Erik Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Michael Gonzalez, Randy Barcena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. Matteson
as 3:2023cv00888
Petitioner:
Gabriel Mosby
Respondent:
Gigi Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberto Gabriel Montoya v. J. Englman et al
as 2:2023cv00723
Petitioner:
Roberto Gabriel Montoya
Respondent:
Warden J. Englman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Broque Anthony Anderson v. Gabriel Santana et al
as 5:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
Broque Anthony Anderson
Defendant:
Gabriel Santana and Lavena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ponce v. Solorio et al
as 1:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Tommy Gabriel Ponce, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Solorio, I. Ruiz, B. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gabriel Espinoza v. Patrick Covello
as 8:2022cv01386
Petitioner:
Gabriel F Espinoza
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trifu v. USA (2255 - 2:21-cr-0182-KJM)
as 2:2022cv01198
Petitioner:
Doru Gabriel Trifu
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gabriel Ontiveros v. Dr. C. Hsein Chiang
as 8:2022cv01270
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Ontiveros
Defendant:
Dr. C. Hsein Chiang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gabriel Pies-Lonsdale v. M. Williams et al
as 5:2022cv01095
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Pies-Lonsdale
Defendant:
M. Williams, Broughton, Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
