Cases 21 - 30 of 357
Clemente Manuel Gamboa Jr. v. Riverside District Attorney et al
as 5:2023cv02075
Plaintiff:
Clemente Manuel Gamboa, Jr.
Defendant:
Riverside District Attorney and Department of Correction State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Buchanan v. Gamboa
as 2:2023cv02731
Defendant:
Jeffrey Buchanan and Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Gamboa v. Banuelos et al
as 2:2023cv08959
Plaintiff:
David Gamboa
Defendant:
Banuelos, Munoz, Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Buchanan et al
as 2:2023at01197
Defendant:
Jeffrey Buchanan and Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Gamboa v. Banuelos et al
as 1:2023cv01397
Plaintiff:
David Gamboa
Defendant:
Banuelos, Munoz, Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Torres v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv01266
Plaintiff:
Sergio Peralta Torres
Defendant:
Sergio Romance, Joe Sullivan, Vijay Desai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Anthony Joseph Eidem v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 1:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Eidem
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Barry Green, C. Vang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Valenzuela v. Burns et al
as 1:2023cv01353
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Valenzuela
Defendant:
Burns, Santiesteban, Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Stepp v. Gamboa
as 2:2023cv01892
Petitioner:
Jasson Michael Stepp
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clemente Manuel Gamboa Jr. v. Riverside District Attorney et al
as 5:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Clemente Manuel Gamboa, Jr.
Defendant:
Riverside District Attorney and Eric Balasteros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
