Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Golden v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
Brent Golden
Defendant:
David Gonzales and Russ Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Corrections Corp et al
as 6:2010cv00492
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gray
Defendant:
Corrections Corp, Daren Swenson, Kate Walgren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snider v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv01036
Plaintiff:
Christopher S Snider
Defendant:
United States of America, Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Ledezma
as 5:2010cv00670
Petitioner:
Roberto Everado Gonzales
Respondent:
H A Ledezma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Golden v. Smothermon et al
as 5:2009cv01267
Plaintiff:
Brent Golden
Defendant:
Richard Smothermon, David Gonzales and Kathryn Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snider v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00822
Plaintiff:
Christopher S Snider
Defendant:
United States of America, Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma State Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Hews et al
as 5:2009cv00008
Plaintiff:
Trenton Hawkins
Defendant:
Karen Hews and Abie Gonzales
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Al-Shewaily v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2007cv00946
Petitioner:
Hamead Jaber Al-Shewaily
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Nuria Prendes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cao v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2007cv00937
Petitioner:
Phu Quoc Cao
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Nuria Prendes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
