Cases 21 - 30 of 161
Nicholas v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00324
Respondent:
Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Arthur Nicholas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Langley v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2015cv00273
Respondent:
James Caldwell and State of Louisiana
Petitioner:
Steven Langley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galmon v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2015cv00260
Respondent:
James Caldwell and Lt. Col Darrel Vannoy
Petitioner:
Travis Galmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00223
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Nate Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. East Feliciana Parish Office et al
as 3:2015cv00148
Respondent:
James Caldwell and East Feliciana Parish Office
Petitioner:
Michael D Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00135
Petitioner:
Calvin Lopez Alexander
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharp v. Warden et al
as 3:2015cv00118
Respondent:
James Caldwell and Unknown Warden
Petitioner:
George Lee Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Cain et al
as 5:2015cv00439
Plaintiff:
Gary A Bailey
Defendant:
Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perkins v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00041
Respondent:
N Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Steve Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00018
Respondent:
Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Thomas Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
