Cases 21 - 30 of 168
Maurice Campbell v. CDCR, et al
as 10-17353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE C. CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of California, RODERICK Q. HICKMAN and others
Aaron Cooper v. Jeanne Woodford
as 10-16522
Petitioner - Appellant:
AARON L. COOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director CDCR
Anthony Dawkins v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 10-55722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. DAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, T. OCHOA, C. BUTLER and others
Julian de Medeiros v. James Yates, et al
as 10-15919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN GAGO DE MEDEIROS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON, GAIL LEWIS and others
Fernando Guizar v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 10-15570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO GUIZAR
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, E. ALAMEIDA, Jr., G. HARRIS and others
Defendant:
S C WOHLEND, V C BASSO, S. JAMES and others
Wesley v. Walker et al
as 3:2010cv00196
Petitioner:
Andre Wesley
Respondent:
J Walker, Jeanne S Woodford and Bill Lockyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jose Rivera v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 10-15078
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA
Paul Guardado v. Margarita Perez, et al
as 09-17832
Petitioner - Appellee:
PAUL ALBERT GUARDADO
Respondent - Appellant:
MARGARITA PEREZ, Chairwoman, California Board of Prison Terms, JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director, California Department of Corrections and A. P. KANE, Warden
Xiong Yang v. Jeanne Woodford
as 09-17813
Petitioner - Appellant:
XIONG NICK YANG
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD
Leonard Rubio v. Jeanne Woodford
as 09-17564
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEONARD PAUL RUBIO
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
