Cases 21 - 30 of 479
Dale Rodabaugh v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 18-55919
Petitioner - Appellant:
DALE STEPHEN RODABAUGH
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD and M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden
Richard Joseph Crane v. Jeffrey A. Beard et al
as 2:2018cv05957
Defendant:
J. Camacho, Jeffrey A. Beard and Debbie Asuncion
Plaintiff:
Richard Joseph Crane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vester Patterson v. Sam Do, et al
as 18-16233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VESTER L. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM WONG DO, N. HASHEMI, J. CLARK KELSO and others
Mario Navarro v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 18-55777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID LONG, MORENO and others
Marcus Hays v. Municipal and Probate Superior, et al
as 18-55704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS DESHONNE HAYS
Defendant - Appellee:
MUNICIPAL AND PROBATE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Inglewood Courthouse, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALFIORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Southwest District Torrance Courthouse, JEFFREY A. BEARD, The State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations and others
Robert Lehmann v. Jeffrey Beard
as 18-55711
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LEHMANN
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Taiwan Jefferson v. Jeffrey Beard
as 18-55699
Petitioner - Appellant:
TAIWAN D. JEFFERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Wilhelm v. Beard et al
as 2:2018cv01125
Plaintiff:
Steve Wilhelm
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard and Ikwinder Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Downs v. Jeffrey Beard
as 18-15782
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY DOWNS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Joseph Kelly v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 18-15696
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH KELLY
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and RON DAVIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
