Cases 21 - 30 of 108
JONES v. KAINE et al
as 1:2018cv00612
Plaintiff:
MACEO JONES
Defendant:
THOMAS KAINE, ANGELA DUNBAR, LE MASTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2018cv00524
Petitioner:
MACEO JONES and SALLIE JONES
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, ANGELA DUNBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCDANIEL v. JONES et al
as 1:2017cv02790
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MCDANIEL
Defendant:
R. JONES, BOND and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. POLUNSKY DISCIPLINARY & CLASSIFY OFFICIALS et al
as 1:2017cv00887
Plaintiff:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Defendant:
POLUNSKY DISCIPLINARY & CLASSIFY OFFICIALS and TEXAS BOARD PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. RUSSO et al
as 1:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
J. RUSSO, SHAW and TERRY O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2016cv02261
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, ELBERT GRIFFIN, DOUGLAS CARLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02160
Plaintiff:
JUAN ALBERTO ORTIZ-LOPEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JORGE LUIS SOLAR-CHIMA and others
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. ATCHINSON et al
as 1:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES, LAFAYETTE DOTSON, ADONNIS ATCHINSON and others
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, PHIL MENDELSON, KENNYAN MUDUFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMIREZ v. HICKENLOOPER et al
as 1:2016cv01882
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALFONSO SOLARES RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, RICK RAEMISH, TIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FELDER v. LEGGETT et al
as 1:2016cv01865
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MARKELL FELDER
Defendant:
ISIAL LEGGETT, M. JONES, TIMOTHY BETTIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
