Cases 21 - 30 of 267
DAWSON v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv04850
Plaintiff:
JAMES K DAWSON
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, MICHAEL DANTICO and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY & REHABILITATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LLEWLYN v. KODGER
as 1:2022cv03810
Petitioner:
CHARLES LLEWLYN and OWEN ODMAN
Respondent:
DR. K. KODGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLORES v. KODGER
as 1:2022cv03750
Petitioner:
RAMON FLORES
Respondent:
DR. K. KODGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FONTANEZ v. KUHN et al.
as 1:2022cv03046
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FONTANEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER VICTORIA L. KUHN, AL SOLANIK, ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYES v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv02580
Plaintiff:
IDRIYS HAYES
Defendant:
E. THOMAS, K. MYERS, Z. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANGO v. CORTESE et al
as 1:2022cv02579
Plaintiff:
NOEL K. BANGO
Defendant:
MARY CORTESE, DEPTFORD POLICE DISTRICT, BRIAN HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARMER v. PLUMERI et al
as 3:2022cv00957
Plaintiff:
ALLEN J. FARMER
Defendant:
SAMUEL PLUMERI, SGT. K. WARD, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNIS v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
JOHN K. DENNIS
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. MALLIET et al
as 1:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS and K. W. LEWIS
Defendant:
JOYCE M. MALLIET, THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT, CASE MANAGER MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIORDANO v. OCEAN COUNTY et al
as 3:2021cv20482
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIORDANO
Defendant:
OCEAN COUNTY, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
