Cases 21 - 30 of 93
Goins v. Kettlekamp
as 3:2023cv03310
Petitioner:
Georg Goins
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul and Sheriff Bruce Kettlekamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woods v. Warden Christian County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv03306
Petitioner:
Troy Woods
Respondent:
Warden Christian County Sheriff's Office and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sherman v. Raoul
as 3:2023cv03309
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sherman
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crutcher v. Kettlekamp
as 3:2023cv03308
Petitioner:
David Crutcher
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul and Sheriff Bruce Kettlekamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hayden v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03251
Petitioner:
Richard T Hayden
Respondent:
Latoya Hughes, Cherryle Hinthorne, Kwame Raoule and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv14204
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Kim Foxx, Michael Blaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50352
Petitioner:
Hannibal Eason
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul, Latoya Hughes and Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05339
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Suarez v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2023cv05354
Petitioner:
Jose Suarez
Respondent:
Hinthorne and Kwame Raoule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pennington v. Raoul
as 4:2023cv04120
Plaintiff:
Robert L Pennington, Jr
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
