Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
SCANLON v. LAWSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv04465
Plaintiff: EDWARD SCANLON, IV
Defendant: VALERIE LAWSON, FELIX MICKENS , ROBERT BALICKI and others
Cross_claimant: ROBERT BALICKI , VERONICA SURRENCY and MICHAEL BARUZZA
Cross_defendant: VALERIE LAWSON and FELIX MICKENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAWSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv04033
Petitioner: ESTON LAWSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LAWSON et al v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2014cv06086
Plaintiff: CHARLES ALEX LAWSON, CHARMAINE PITTS, BERNAE GREEN and others
Defendant: CITY OF VINELAND, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. BORRERO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02955
Plaintiff: ISIAH LAWSON
Defendant: BORRERO, TORRES, DUFFY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIKER v. CMS INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01752
Plaintiff: HASSAN RIKER
Defendant: CMS INC., NJ DOC / CTP, JOHN DOE PAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. WARDEN - C.F.C.F. et al
as 1:2009cv02670
Petitioner: LEMUEL LAWSON
Respondent: WARDEN - C.F.C.F., CAMDEN COUNTY BD. OF PAROLE and DISTRICT ATTY. OF PHILA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAWSON v. WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2009cv01942
Petitioner: LEMEUL LAWSON
Respondent: WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF PAROLE, CITY OF CAMDEN, N.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HINTON v. NEWMAN et al
as 3:2007cv01826
Plaintiff: JAMES JOHN HINTON
Defendant: DANIEL NEWMAN, EDDY RAISIN, WILLIAM WHITLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?