Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Abraham v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Abraham
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Carl Danberg, Patrick Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Wood et al
as 1:2010cv01014
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven P. Wood, Jerome O. Herlihy, Paul R. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. USA
as 1:2010cv00822
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lisa Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. Beckles et al
as 1:2010cv00362
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Robinson
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Scaroborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
Angel Alvarado
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Rogers and Lisa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. National Enquirer et al
as 1:2009cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches and Joshua David Duhamel
Defendant:
National Enquirer doing business as American Media Inc., Star Magazine, Reginald Fitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Phelps et al
as 1:2008cv00395
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Jamison
Defendant:
Phelps, Ronnie Moore, Tracy Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Woods v. First Correctional Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00397
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Woods
Defendant:
First Correctional Medical Inc., Correctional Medical Services Inc., Director of Medical at DCC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Biggins v. Minner et al
as 1:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Minner, Carl C. Danberg, Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
