Cases 21 - 30 of 44
TROWELL v. SOUTH et al
as 2:2010cv02599
Plaintiff:
SALAHDIN TROWELL
Defendant:
JAMES DEAN SOUTH, I. MARCO RODRIGUEZ, F.J. LARAWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2009cv04989
Plaintiff:
RASOOL JENKINS
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, ADMINISTRATOR, SSCF, SID, SSCF, ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KABA v. AVILES et al
as 2:2009cv02064
Petitioner:
ANSUMANE HASSAN KABA
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, SCOTT WEBER, JULIE L. MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ANDERSON v. MCGUIRE et al
as 2:2009cv00340
Petitioner:
GARY PATRICK ANDERSON
Respondent:
LEO P. MCGUIRE, SCOTT WEBER, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AFOLABI v. SPEZIALE et al
as 2:2008cv05278
Petitioner:
LASSISSI AFOLABI
Defendant:
JERRY SPEZIALE, CHARLES MYERS, 1-50 UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS AND OR SORT OR CUSTODY PERSONAL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MYERS v. HAUCK et al
as 2:2008cv04386
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
BRUCE HAUCK, PAUL MARK, G. WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BERBESI v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv03899
Petitioner:
JUAN JOSE ZAMBRANO BERBESI
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JULIE L. MYERS, JOHN P. TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MARTIN v. ROCHE et al
as 2:2008cv03004
Plaintiff:
ELBERT THOMAS MARTIN
Defendant:
M ROCHE, R. COX, T. FRIEDERICHS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROSARIO-PORTER v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv02926
Petitioner:
FERNANDA ROSARIO-PORTER
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JULIE L. MYERS, JOHN P. TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MYERS v. DEMINCO et al
as 2:2008cv02694
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
D. DEMINCO, B. PADILLO, L. PITUNDNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
